mail icon twitter icon youtube icon facebook icon
barca

La Liga: The New SPL?

Written by in on

Earlier this week, the Ballon d’Or nominations were revealed, with only one English player, Wayne Rooney, in a list dominated by Spain. Does this show that the Spanish league is superior to its English counterpart?

It has been argued for many years, and even more so recently following Barcelona’s domination of European football that La Liga is in fact a better league. Looking at the nomination list, which includes 15 players based in Spain (out of a total 23) and a further two who spent last season there (Eto’o and Aguero), it is hard to argue against it. However, when looking at the list, the one thing that jumps out is the eight players at Barcelona; eight players, who in FIFA’s eyes are some of the best players in the world – that’s three short of a whole starting XI. If the Spanish league didn’t have FC Barcelona in La Liga, would the league be as good?

Without doubt, Real Madrid make the race with Barca interesting, but is Spanish football at a risk of becoming a league similar to the SPL? Both leagues have very different styles of play, but at the end of the season, you know it is going to be either Madrid or Barca or Rangers or Celtic. You have to go back to 2004 to see the last time a team apart from the ‘big two’ won la Liga, Valencia, under a certain Rafael Benitez…

With the English Premier League, you have always had a division between the ‘top teams’ and the others, but it’s not as blatant as in Spain. Recently with the re-emergence of Manchester City as a top team it has certainly made the League that little bit more interesting. Love or hate Sheikh Mansour, he has certainly injected some new life into the Premier League, none more so than this season, with City seeming to be an unstoppable force at the moment. Before the Arab Summer of 2008, the League was still in an interesting situation. You had Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and don’t forget, Liverpool all gunning for glory. It took a few seasons for City to get to the promised peak of English football, but in the meantime, you knew there was still a chance of more than two teams just winning the league.

You can argue of course that Spain has had this as well. In 2008, you had Villarreal emerge as runners up, but normal service resumed soon after with titles being fought over by Madrid and Barcelona. Teams like Sevilla, Atletico Madrid and more recently Levante have all had their time in the limelight, but the division of class between the ‘big two’ seems almost too big now. In fact, you could argue Barcelona are above most Champions League teams at the moment.

Don’t get me wrong. I am not condemning the skill and beauty that Spanish football has. El Clásico has turned into one of the must-watch games for any football fan and Sky Sports’ Spanish football is also great fun to watch. But I certainly feel that we watch the games with a feeling that come the end, it is just going to be a race to the finish line with Barca and Madrid… But why not just sit back and enjoy the football that Spain has to offer, as after all FIFA are implying over half the world’s best players ply their football over there, even if it is just for two teams!

l

Tags

, , , , ,

l

Comments

  • http://www.espangol.com/ Livin La Liga

    It’s an interesting subject of debate. And without doubt Barcelona and Madrid are head and shoulders above the rest at the moment. But have there really been more than 2 teams that have had the potential to win the league in England since the Prem came along? In the last 5 years, before the Man City money, only Man United and Chelsea have been up for it. Before that only Man U and Arsenal (there was a small crossover period when all 3 were challenging).
    In fact, in the last 20 years there have been only 4 premier league winners – Those 3 and Blackburn. In that time 5 teams have won La Liga. This link has more on the comparative stats between La Liga and The Premier League.

  • http://freshairfootball.co.uk Greg

    Perhaps true but going forward only 2 teams look like EVER winning La Liga whereas it isn’t unlikely that Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal can regain the ability to actually become contenders again.

  • Nick

    The real difference between the quality of the two leagues should be measured in the teams in the European places. The Prem shows its superiority as it has 5 teams who seem capable of chasing the top 2 all through the season, ready to pounce on any slip up. No real gap will emerge. Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool and Newcastle probably have the ability to give any La Liga team, other than Barca and Real, a battering home or away. Valencia, Athletico, Malage and Sevilla v the likes of Stoke, Fulham and, at present, Norwich, seems like a more even contest.

  • http://www.espangol.com/ Livin La Liga

    I’ve been mulling over this myself in recent weeks and watching a lot of Spanish football I’m actually left thinking how actually the lesser teams, the Getafes, Levantes etc are actually better now that they are facing up to Barcelona and Madrid.
    Barcelona have won 2 games by a single goal away this season and drawn the other 2. The way Athletic Bilbao played against them the other night there’s no way Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool and Newcastle would batter them, nor Valencia or many other teams. But this is something we can only debate as it can only ever be tested on one off European nights.
    I know Madird and Barca at home are absolutely obliterating some teams, but they are head and shoulders above not only their fellow La Liga contenders but also most of the Premiership. I honestly think if you could swap the Manchester clubs for those two today you’d see them getting the exact same results in the Premiership. They are just the best teams in Europe at present and it’s their own rivalry that is pushing one another to becoming better and better.

  • http://www.espangol.com/ Livin La Liga

    How many actually’s can you get in one opening sentence?!

    • http://freshairfootball.co.uk Greg

      Three it would seem!
      I’m not sure it is as clear-cut as you’ve both said. I think you can judge the general standard of a league by how evenly matched teams are in a one-off game. For example Barca v Granada – how likely is it that Granada would get a result? Compare that with Man City v Bolton.

      Is one more uneven than the other?